Notifications
Clear all

Further Recommendations - Evaluation of Measures (Ecodesign, EEff-MV, EEffG)

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
147 Views
 Ivan
(@ivan)
Posts: 88
Member Admin Registered, Motor Policy Forum
Topic starter
 
  • Terminology Conflict: Austrian legislation uses "technical service lifetime," while the EU Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) refers to "average product lifetime," creating ambiguity in assessing energy savings from motor replacements.

  • Early vs. Post-Life Replacement:

    • Early replacement: Reference energy consumption is based on "normalized final energy consumption" until the motor’s technical lifespan ends.

    • Post-life replacement: "Legal minimum requirements" apply if no market average exists.

  • Practical Challenges: Estimating remaining motor lifespan is speculative, as future repairs or usage are unpredictable. Pragmatic reliance on the M7140 standard (economic efficiency) has been used historically.

  • Strategic Goal: Prioritize motor stock renewal for efficiency gains, balancing calculation accuracy with administrative effort.

 

Key Takeaway: Clarify terminology and adopt flexible methodologies to accelerate motor replacements while acknowledging data limitations.


This topic was modified 9 months ago by Ivan
 
Posted : 23/02/2025 4:51 pm
Share: