Energy-efficient motor replacements offer more than just energy savings—they also bring non-energy benefits (NEBs) like reduced maintenance, improved reliability, and enhanced workplace safety. Integrating NEBs into mandatory motor system analyses can strengthen the business case for investments in efficient technologies.
Proposed Updates:
- Revise the Energy Saving Investigation Obligation template to include a dedicated section for NEBs. For instance, include in the mandatory motor analysis template the preliminary identification of Non-Energy Benefits (NEBs) stemming from the possible measures (“Mogelijke maatregelen, nader uit te werken”), in compliance with the art. 11 EED. A suggested updated table for section 2 (Specificatie van de besparingsmaatregelen) could be:
|
Electric Drive System |
Relevant Characteristics for Periodic Inspection |
Possible Measures |
Possible Non-Energy Benefits (NEBs) |
|
Motor |
I) Older than 15 years or having low efficiency (<IE3) (efficiency according to EU Regulation 2019/1781). |
Replacement of motor and/or application at the end of its economic life with high-efficiency models with proper sizing. |
- Increased reliability due to new technology. - Lower maintenance from modern motors with less wear. |
|
Pump (including motor) |
II) Older than 15 years or having low efficiency (lower than the minimum efficiency according to EU Regulation 547/2012). |
Replacement of pump and motor with energy-efficient models. |
- Extended equipment lifespan. |
|
Fan (including motor) |
III) Older than 10 years or having low efficiency (lower than the minimum efficiency according to EU Regulation 327/2011). |
Replacement of fan and motor with efficient models and capacity adjustment. |
- Improved air quality through better ventilation control. |
|
Compressor (including motor) |
IV) Where the compressor package is older than 10 years. |
Replacement of outdated compressors with efficient models including energy recovery systems. |
- Improved process reliability and uptime. |
|
Motor |
V) Not turned off (or down) during low (process) load or idle periods, and continue running regardless of process demand. |
Proper control of the systems to turn off unused motors, pumps, fans, compressors, and machines, and remove unnecessary bypasses. |
- Increased productivity through more efficient process control. |
|
Motor |
VI) Not adjusted to changing functional requirements (compared to the design), causing underloaded operation (low load, <60%). |
Adjust or replace the machine with a high-efficiency model and properly tune power, frequency, flow, and controls to match demand; check periodically. |
- Better alignment with process requirements for increased flexibility. |
|
Pump |
VII) Not adjusted to changing functional requirements (compared to design), resulting in insufficient operating hours near the optimal working area/BEP (best efficiency point). |
Optimize or replace components to better align with the optimal working area (BEP). |
- Improved system performance by operating in the optimal range. |
|
Motor |
VIII) Having inefficient components and/or settings, such as throttling valves, vanes, inefficient transmissions, bypasses, (parts of) piping with high flow resistance. |
Replace and/or adjust one or more components of the drive systems, for example, remove throttling and apply speed control, use a high-efficiency transmission, apply direct drive with speed control, and modify piping. |
- Reduced mechanical wear through optimization. |